Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from March 8, 2015

Cigarette filters take fifteen years to disintegrate - ever wonder why? - A Natural News exclusive look

Look, down on the sidewalk: It's not a sponge, it's not a huge pencil eraser, it's the butt of a cancer stick, and it won't be going away any time soon. You see them everywhere: on the beaches, in parking lots, on the grass at the park, in the gutters and in the smokers' sand-filled ashtrays outside of office buildings. A cigarette filter keeps the smoker's fingers cool, even when just half-an-inch away burns a red-hot cherry at 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit during the inhale. Cigarette filters or "butts" function like your attic insulation in the summer, keeping the house cool from the immense heat. But the heat from a burning cigarette carries with it more than just jacked-up nicotine, ammonia and formaldehyde; the smoke carries heavy metal toxins, bleach from the white paper and... wait for it... glass wool fibers . This is why it takes between 5 and 15 years for a cigarette to break down, break apart and disappear into the earth. No matt

If Jimmy Kimmel lived in the 1950's, he would be telling you to SMOKE CIGARETTES

It's fun to watch smart comedians like Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert make fun of the insane government and Big Pharma that run television advertisements on all the major networks. Then you have Jimmy Kimmel, the hack that attacks people who are against vaccinations that contain embalming fluid, MSG and mercury, and comedy here has resorted to its basest level. Let's take a quick look back in history of when the USA started pushing health detriments on us all, in the most insidious ways, and then we'll get back to talking about Jimmy Kimmel and why his little rant does actually matter, but not in the way he would wish upon us. You can watch his little rant right here first, then come back to reading, so you can understand how alternative media takes apart the myths piece by piece by piece. Kimmel wants everyone to get toxic vaccines that cause disease and he calls the rest of us crazy for not listening to the quacks that push them. He has actually attempted to work

What's a "Schedule 1 Cancer Killer" and should it be legal?

  One in every three Americans will get cancer in their lifetime and only half survive it. Still, chemicals in foods, drinks, tap water and vaccines go highly underrated, and the common man, woman and child end up with cancer, wondering how to fight it and if they will survive. Nobody wants to have to take drugs to fight a disease that's attacking your cells, because common sense says adding more chemicals would make things worse, but guess what? Most Americans succumb to what their doctors advise them to do, and medical doctors in the US are told to advise surgery, chemotherapy and radiation for cancer. Besides the stress of it all, if that doesn't kill you, the hospitals in America are loaded with superbugs that are now immune to antibiotics. Antibiotics were once America 's super-drug for combating hospital bacteria. Those days have passed. This is the "War on Drugs" and it's a political war FOR chemical drugs to be given to cancer patients. These

The Pew Research Center has blown the whistle as to how the government is collecting data about individuals and violating their privacy!

According to Natural News , a recent poll conducted by the Pew Research Center revealed that nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of investigative reporters in the United States believe that the government has "probably collected data about their phone calls, emails or online communications, and eight-in-ten believe that being a journalist increases the likelihood that their data will be collected." This is a shocking revelation, especially considering the fact that the current administration promised to be "the most transparent" in the nation's history. In fact, the Obama Administration has shown itself to be remorseless in pursuing those who leak information to the press and in spying on reporters who dare to investigate its activities. A free press is fundamental to a free society, and perhaps the most troubling aspect of this story is the fact that so few reporters seem outraged or even concerned about the government's interference in their profes