Saturday, June 4, 2016

The EPA--the Environmental "Punishment" Agency?


First “Proposed” as an Executive Order by Richard Nixon back in 1970, and later ratified by committee hearings in both houses, the Environmental Protection Agency, headquartered in Washington, D.C., now has 27 laboratories for assessing environmental concerns to help the EPA enforce national laws and standards. Supposedly, the EPA works with ALL levels of government, in wide variety, to control and prevent pollution. As of late, mainstream media has a total blackout of the negligence of the EPA to do their job, and there are repeat offenses with no punishments being doled out for huge negligence mistakes regarding assessing hazards; such as NOT assessing lead in tap water, or NOT dumping toxic waste into rivers that span multiple states, or NOT raising the levels of glyphosate allowable in food and ground water just because a corporation (Monsanto) (11) tells them to, and now that the WHO, World Health Organization, (14) has declared that glyphosate (3) (50% of Roundup Herbicide Weed-Killer Formula), is “probably carcinogenic” to humans. That comes directly from a top-notch study done by scientists from AROUND the globe who work for the IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer. (4)

The EPA employs over 15,000 full-time people and many more by contract. More than half of these are scientists, engineers and environmental protection “specialists,” yet, recently, NONE of them have been deployed to dire health situations around the United States. Plus, there is little-tono press coverage of the same problems that the EPA won’t address and are being sued for right now. The EPA has their own legal specialists and information technologists who work under the same umbrella mission statement that is not being carried out properly. This requires in-depth consideration.

In 2013, EPA headquarters was auspiciously renamed William Jefferson Clinton Federal Building, after the former president “Bill,” who’s vice president first pushed the global warming agenda, with his campaign heard around the world, supposedly by his own accord–and that man would be Al Gore (during Clinton’s 2nd term in office).

The EPA is also using the hoax-like “safer choice” labels, so consumers can choose between products with less-dangerous chemicals. Must Americans’ choices be between the lesser of two evils, or should they eat healthy–the EPA goal here is in question. “Safer choice” is supposed to mean that everything the food processing industry purposely adds is tested, which it most certainly is not. However, the EPA does regulate fuel economy for vehicles by analyzing test results and measuring total carbon captured from exhaust, still, ethanol is allowed in gasoline that burns up motors over time, creating a larger problem in the process. The “protection agency” constantly contradicts itself in these manners, regulating one industry rigidly while completely deregulating another that participates in chemical violence of agriculture, and then the EPA accepts, on top of that, the research and tests regarding so-called “safety” from the very manufacturers of these chemical toxins – ones that pollute the environment and cause cancer in animals, as proven in labs (http://www.gmoseralini.org/en/), such as the chemical-based herbicide Roundup, or the Bt toxin pesticide inserted in corn. Then there is the subject of neonicitinoids killing mass bee populations responsible for the majority of human food sustainability.

US drinking water polluted with sodium fluoride – a known carcinogen
2006: The EPA’s “Watersense” program is supposed to encourage water efficiency by using a label. This would affect toilets, faucets and irrigation equipment. Then came the “Safe Drinking Water Act” written to ensure safe drinking water for the public, except for the fact that sodium fluoride has been added to US water for decades, in fact, scores, since before WWII. Sodium fluoride is not the naturally occuring fluoride that dentists claim is good for teeth. In fact, sodium fluoride is a byproduct of chemical industry and can be used as a chemical-based insecticide. Adolf Hitler gave it to the Jewish people in their water during WWII to keep them weak and malnourished. (7)

Still, the EPA Safe Water Drinking Act regulates wells, precipation, and surface water, stating certain standards they enforce, while ignoring the “elephants in the room” – namely glyphosate and sodium fluoride, which both cause cancer in lab animals and humans. This is not “safe” drinking as regulated by a regulatory agency funded by taxpayers. Most countries around the world wouldn’t dare add sodium fluoride to their drinking water, especially those countries that have a national healthcare system. Then the government would be “shooting themselves in the foot” and footing the bill for it, over and over and over. The EPA may be less than useless, they may be harmful themselves. (6)

Fuel rods bore through the concrete floor at Fukushima nuclear meltdown
The EPA is also supposed to protect the public from radiation, but no risk assessments have been made in the past years since the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan has completely melted down and radiation is spreading to the US via ocean water, fish, debris, and even ships. Are we importing food from this region? Where are the regulations? Where is the press coverage? Ask the EPA where is the “radiation source reduction and management” task force they have put together. Nobody in the US seems to know this problem has reached both the West coast and the East coast of the US, namely so far California and Massachusettes.

The following is true and is what the EPA is NOT reporting on: Massachusetts rainwater found to be contaminated with low levels of radiation from Fukushima. Radioactive material has been released into the air, not just the sea. Nuclear experts are coming out with the truth, saying everyone has been lied to. The situation is much more serious than mass media lets on. Recent radiation readings at Fukushima show contamination 100,000 times normal in water at the No. 2 reactor, and nearly 2,000 times normal by the ocean. The radiation leak at Reactor No. 2 is now measured at 1,000 millisieverts an hour – enough to cause human hair to fall out from a single exposure event. Radiation sickness begins around 100 millisieverts.

The levels of radiation at Fukushima are so high, it’s nearly impossible for workers to try to salvage the wreckage, where spent fuel rods are crashed at the bottom of a 4 story “pool” – where they lay entangled and spreading poisonous radiation. Nearby nations like Taiwan are considering ditching nuclear power altogether after this event took place, and possibly phase it out by 2025. (21)
The question is how will any of these nations deal with the hazardous waste that’s already been created, and will the EPA be truthful and let Americans know the dangers with exposure? Will the FDA collaborate with the USDA to recommend how to help humans detoxify from cesium 137?
July, 2004: Anne Gorsuch Burford, former EPA director under Ronald Reagan, involved in $1.6 billion scandel
Anne Burford died of cancer at age 62, but not before she resigned from the EPA (in 1983) over “mismanagement” of a 1.6 billion dollar program that was supposed to clean up hazardous waste dumps. She claims she cut clean water regulations by more than 90%, but she left in the sodium fluoride. She dismantled the EPA, single-handedly. She “downsized” federal agencies by delegating their functions and services (that they are PAID to handle) to the states. She cut budgets for research and enforcement – basically deregulated across the board any environmental protections still in place. Burford DRASTICALLY reduced the number of cases filed against polluters. Under Anne Burford, the EPA attempted to set aside a 30-by-40-mile rectangle of ocean just east of the Delaware-Maryland coastline, where incinerator ships could burn toxic wastes (at 1,200 degrees centigrade – to be specific).

Ret. EPA Director Anne G. Burford calls embezzlement and the planned pollution of America her “expensive mid-life education”

The EPA, rather than making a martyr of Burford, forced her to resign when she was cited for contempt of Congress for holding back records of her “Superfunds”– saying they were protected by “executive privilege.” She said herself she was acting under President Ronald Reagan’s orders, so then, how “great” of a president was Reagan, really? This is a treacherous act that besieges the environment of the country they are sworn to protect. One question remains – how much money, “earned income,” did Burford and her cohorts make from this treachery? Some Americans feel that she should be tried for her crimes. Again, none of this was in the mainstream press in this light, reflecting the truth and showing the true EPA method of operation, since decades ago.

With no punishment and no regret, Burford wrote a book called “Are You Tough Enough?” and referred to the whole $1.6 billion dollar treacherous scam as an “expensive mid-life education.” Her only “crime” was loyal service to Reagan, much like the scientists who only “did what they were told” under Adolf Hitler in WWII using Zyklon B for gas chambers. It’s time the EPA reports to the taxpayers who live anywhere near the Delaware-Maryland coastline and near toxic dumps created by EPA directors. (13) Is the EPA swat team similar to the Nazi SS? Check the “task force” records.

2007: EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson declares climate change imperils public welfare–purports propaganda for first national mandatory global-warming regulations
When it comes to automobile emissions, the EPA exclaims “science” for proof this area of pollution is being strictly addressed and “regulated,” but when it comes to global warming, there is no scientific proof it’s really going on at all, in fact, it’s just the other way around. Natural News published a graph that shows how temperatures over the past century have been manipulated to reflect incorrect data making it look like human actions are “heating up” our world, but the real graphs show we are on a slight cooling trend, if anything.

Global warming a hoax perpetuated by skewed satellite temperature data and the EPA’s propaganda
In December of 2007, EPA Administrator Johnson approved a draft of a document that DECLARED climate change was endangering Americans. This triggered concern for mandatory global-warming regulations from the White House. It never happened. Later, in 2008, Johnson rescinded his “mandatory” climate change warning document and issued a new version that did NOT state global warming was a danger to public welfare, then he resigned under protest. It’s pivotal here to realize that the global warming issue being pushed on America is a script written by a global government and it’s science fraud. The satellite data purported to show a warming “trend” over the last hundred years has been fraudulently altered to show a warming trend where none exists. (5)
The political motivation for this theory exists as a catapult for creating regulations that enable embezzlement of millions, if not billions, of dollars through two-dimensional companies and even “non-profit” organizations that never do anything but “exist” on paper. If the EPA was so concerned about human welfare, why wouldn’t they be working to control Fukushima radiation with all their “resources” and taxpayer funding? After all, true science shows us that CO2 creates food abundance and provides for reforestation. Instead, “science” has been corrupted by corporations and corporate-led US regulatory agencies that are actually abandoning the very principles of real science.

Worried about mercury in fish, water and etc.? Worry about mercury in flu shots and vaccines at 25,000 times EPA limits for water
 
Several US states sue the EPA
 
March 2005: Nine US states, including California, New York and New Mexico, sued the EPA. The EPA’s own inspector general determined that the EPA’s regulation of mercury emissions set by their own Clean Air Act were not being followed by top “political” appointees, and that the EPA had suppressed a study (that was EPA commissioned by Harvard University) that contradicted its own position. Basically, power flants were allowed to forego mercury emission regulations. Lobbyists must have paid off the regulators to look the other way.

August 2003: The White House puts pressure on EPA to DELETE cautionary information about air quality in NY City following the 9/11 attacks.

Natural News tests flu vaccine for heavy metals, finds 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water

For several years now, the EPA’s job has been getting done by an independent lab called the Natural News Forensic Food Lab. The CDC, FDA and EPA should be concerned about mercury in medicine, as they proclaim their desires to educate the masses about mercury in fish, water, emissions, and more. Now, testing has been done to expose just HOW MUCH MERCURY people are willingly and forcibly being injected with on a regular basis, including California, the state where gun-point-vaccination is the law.

Tests conducted at the Natural News Forensic Food Lab, via ICP-MS equipment, revealed that a particular flu vaccine (called Fluluval by GSK), contained over 50 parts per million, that’s 25,000 times higher than the EPA’s drinking level contaminant MAXIMUM for inorganic mercury for tap water. The absolute hypocrisy of the EPA to fake concern about mercury in water and fish and then ignore this SCIENTIFIC FACT is beyond criminal, it’s genocidal. Then the CDC, EPA and the FDA create a mass media blackout when the top CDC scientist blows the whistle and admits a decade-old fact (from 2004 research and results) that mercury in the MMR vaccines was leading to a high ratio of African American boys becoming autistic if injected with it before age three. (19)

LINKING MERCURY POISONING TO AUTISM
The FULL CONFESSION of Dr. William Thompson, CDC scientist, is available here:
(http://www.truthwiki.org/dr-william-thompson/)

Fact: Injecting mercury is far more dangerous to the human than consuming it because by injection the mercury bypasses skin, digestion or breathing (lungs) as filtration fronts, and is directly injected into muscle tissue, sending the immune system into a fight or flight panic. Again, the EPA has miseducated and misled the public. (18)
Fact: Mercury consumed orally is easily blocked by eating common foods like strawberries or peanut butter, both of which bind with and capture about 90% of dietary mercury, this is research based and according to the Health Ranger’s freely published results of the lab testing.
According to Natural News lab tests, the concentration of mercury found in the GSK flu shot was 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury they ever tested in contaminated fish. Shockingly, the package insert for this flu shot readily admits the vaccine has never been subjected to scientific clinical trials.

Firm required by EPA to keep secret agreement about contaminated water in Animas River, Missouri
Environmental Restoration LLC, a Missouri-based company responsible for the spill of millions of gallons of waste in Cement Creek, was forced by the EPA to sign a secrecy agreement to keep the citizens in the dark, while CONTAMINATED WATER flowed right down the Animas River. (1) The company also had to sign a statement saying they could not publish or release any info without the EPA’s “express advance written approval.” In other words, if the restoration company told any humans they were drinking poison, they would be prosecuted by the EPA task force that enforces laws in the USA. This is the age-old practice of silencing whistleblowers, and by any means necessary. This is the Environmental Protection Agency of the USA engaged in criminal acts by hiding information from the citizens about an environmental and MAJOR HEALTH DISASTER. Fortunately, for the health community, EPA’s own insider (an official) blew the whistle on the whole operation.

Citizen scientists open private laboratory to do job the EPA is supposed to do
Conducting water sample tests using EPA methodology (ICP-MS using an Agilent 7700x instrument and EPA methodology at parts per billion), two citizen scientists are leading a non-profit food and water lab in central Texas, and are now beginning to analyze tap water across the USA for lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, copper and other toxic elements (http://epawatch.org/). (2) Since the EPA doesn’t seem to care about water containing these heavy metal toxins and hazardous waste damaging adults, children, babies and pregnant women alike, Forensic food scientist Mike Adams has teamed with a former NASA contract scientist to conduct nationwide scientific analysis of heavy metals in the tap water of U.S. cities and the results will be published FOR FREE as a public service, since the EPA can’t seem to do their job, the one for which taxpayers pay for out of their own paychecks. (12)

This entire mission is being organized by the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center. Within three months at least 100 US cities will be tested for contaminated municipal water supply and the results posted to the public at EPAwatch.org. (8)

In the spirit of citizen science and the democratization of science, we are taking on this task because the EPA has failed the citizens of Flint, Michigan,” explained Mike Adams.

When government regulators refuse to do their jobs, it is the duty and responsibility of citizen scientists to take on that task in the public interest. The health and lives of millions of children are at stake,” …

We don’t have time to wait for the EPA to someday decide to do its job. We need to protect our children right now.” (13)

Fluoride scandal has been run for decades: Poison water feeds Big Pharma business as people get bone cancer
The fluoride dripped into municipal water supplies is not naturally occurring fluoride at all. The EPA “regulates” a drip of hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium silicofluoride, two chemicals that are considered highly toxic, by the EPA themselves. So why is the combination suddenly safe? It’s not. Both ingredients are classified as hazardous waste, and when packaged for transportation MUST BE LABELED as poison and handled by only workers wearing industrial-level safety gear. So where do hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium silicofluoride come from? http://www.naturalnews.com/001807_fluoride_fluoridation.html

Phosphate mining companies creating fertilizers release toxic fluoride chemicals from smokestacks of the operations, and nearby farms suffer devastating losses of livestock and vegetation. (9) Now mining companies “capture” the chemical vapors to spare themselves, the plants and the animals the massive toxic overload.

Then the chemicals are “harvested” – essentially collected, repackaged and shipped to the USA, where the regulatory agency that is supposed to protect our water dumps this highly toxic hazardous waste product in, all in the name of chemical medicine and a sick care industry that the EPA regulators can legally (and illegally) profit from, through lobbyist gifts, insider trading, and writing legislation that supports corporate interests, their own investments, and the complete and utter deregulation of safety and efficacy standards for conventional agriculture and the biotechnology-chemical-agriculture industrial complex. It’s a business and it’s called water fluoridation. The AMA then steps in and has every dentist in the country swear allegiance to the ADA and tell the masses the most sinister health myth of the past hundred years – fluoride fights cavities. It’s all a lie. It’s also a violation of federal law. The EPA is committing a terrorist act every time they dump sodium fluoride into tap water. Why not fight terrorism through the tap water, or cancer, or diabetes?

Fluoride is a mutagen that causes genetic damage and leads to development of bone, bladder and lung cancer
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) reveals laboratory studies that show the fluoride compound causes genetic damage at levels that are currently in food and the environment that are comparable to the ‘micro’ environments in the body, say the oral cavity, pineal gland or the kidneys. These microenvironments are where our cells get exposed to fluoride levels comparable to those causing genetic damage in labs using rodents and cells of primates, including great apes AND HUMANS. In fact, cells of primates are MORE susceptible to fluoride’s mutagenic effects than the cells of rodents. That’s the complete opposite of what the chemical industries have proclaimed for decades – that we’re NOT as susceptible or that we’re different. Yes, we’re different alright.

Fluoride and Bone Cancer (Osteosarcoma)
The US government ran their own animal study that linked fluoride to bone cancer. Osteosarcoma is a “rare” form of cancer that strikes during teenage years. Harvard scientists published a national case study in 2006 that found boys exposed to fluoridated water during their mid-childhood growth spurt had ELEVATED RISK of developing bone cancer during adolescence (Bassin 2006). Further, the previous results of the NTP study was then consistent with this Harvard Study. Both studies are also consistent with the ones run by NCI and the New Jersey Department of Health. So now we know there is an age-specific risk connecting this chemical with male animals getting bone cancer. No one study can be called a “fluke” now. What is the EPA doing about all of this scientific proof of poison in US food and drinking water? Ignoring the facts and deregulating chemical industries while raising levels of allowable poisons in food and agriculture.

Fact: Bone is the principal site of fluoride accumulation, particularly during rapid growth periods for children (fastest growth periods are 0-2 years and then during puberty, usually 9-14). (20)

Bladder and lung cancer are also attributed to fluoride exposure, according to a number of different studies where workers get exposed, for example, through PAHs (poly aromatic hydrocarbons), or airborne contaminants.

June 2013: EPA raises glyphosate tolerance level to help Monsanto spread MORE chemical herbicide on American crops A new regulation set a few years back allows “forage and hay teff” to contain up to 100 parts per million (ppm) glyphosate, and that’s over a million times the concentration that can cause cancer. The “regulation” allows oilseed crops, such as canola oil, soybean oil, olive oil and flax oil to contain UP TO 40 PPM GLYPHOSATE, which is over 100,000 times the concentration that causes cancer (14).

The new “regulation” RAISES the allowable glyphosate contamination level of root crops like potatoes from the previous fairly low level of 200 parts per billion to 6,000 PARTS PER BILLION, and raises the glyphosate contamination level for fruits more than double previous levels. Again, where is the EPA on all of this? No comments! The EPA had no comments when all this was filed. Why? Because Monsanto writes the regulations now, especially since the World Health Organization linked glyphosate to cancer, and Dr. Oz aired the special show to expose the research of the IARC to the unknowing masses. (25) (26) (27)
Monsanto once claimed glyphosate is as safe as eating table salt. Glyphosate is part of animal feed also, at concentrations 1,000,000 times needed to cause cancer. The EPA continues to allow glyphosate at 700 ppb in public drinking water, too. Still, the EPA only reviews “scientific data” if it comes from the manufacturer and they have put a “safe” label on it. There are no further inspections, checks and balances, independent studies, or scientific proof that can convince the EPA otherwise–to them it’s simply a matter of raising levels of poisons so they can’t be held accountable, nor the companies and corporations that genetically “weave” toxins into US crops and pollute the water with even more known carcinogens. The bottom line is that all “scientific” data showing glyphosate to be “safe” has been fabricated, and the EPA is basing its conclusions on fabricated, corporate junk science that has one purpose: trick regulators into believing the deadly poison is safe, thus increasing the usage of the chemicals by farmers.

When a person adds up the glyphosate and fluoride consumption for an average day, including foods contaminated with both, tap water contaminated with both, beverages contaminated with both, it’s easy to see why every third American develops cancer in their life and, then, there’s another reason only half survive–the medicine conventionally given to “fight” cancer is more chemicals that cause more cancer. The EPA wants no part in this discussion.
In fact, according to the Health Ranger, Mike Adams, allowing 100 ppm of glyphosate in animal feed is equivalent to allowing 1000 ppm of lead in children’s candy. It’s a deadly poison that inundates our food supply at such high concentrations that it’s guaranteed to cause deadly diseases in huge numbers of people.

There is NO safe level of exposure to sodium fluoride, glyphosate or mercury: http://www.naturalnews.com/040842_glyphosate_EPA_regulations_contamination_levels.html#ixzz41VRV6Dqh
For more information about fluoride sold as pesticide:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=DEEF48665F9E2D09D6103D58C823967E
2016: EPA implicated in responsibility for mass bee die-offs, thanks to scientific cover-up of toxic neonicotinoids

They are not only the most widely used class of chemical pesticides in the world, but they’re killing bees by the millions. Neonicotinoids are sprayed on seeds and plants and are meanwhile killing the very pollinators of our food right at the source, the bee hives. What happens? The treated seeds grow up into plants that contain the chemicals at the systemic level–producing chemicals therefore in their pollen and nectar, and that’s what is transported by the bees, back “home.” It’s the same as humans going to the grocery store and purchased glyphosate contaminated food and fluoridated bottled water, and bringing it back home to the mother, the children, and the infants. (16)

Beekeepers around the nation (and world) are reporting massive hive losses as a result of these noxious chemicals being spread around freely, with no regulation from the USDA or the EPA. Entire swarms are poisoned. Extensive chemical pesticide use and crop monocultures have contributed to this national and preventable tragedy that’s happening now. Science is proving that multiple pesticide exposures are weakening bee immune systems. This makes them much more vulnerable to other pests and even diseases. Thanks to the EPA, neonicotinoid seed treatments are NOT considered pesticide use, so farmers are oblivious to what’s happening. The federal government needs to reassess the safety of this CLASS OF CHEMICALS. (22)
Neonicotinoids first approved by EPA in 1990s – trace levels not yet examined
Twenty years ago, scientists had no idea about the true toxicity of this class of pesticide. They thought it was only dangerous at high levels. However, a recent assessment by the EPA says one of the most common types, called imidacloprid, is toxic to bees at RESIDUE LEVELS above 25 ppb (parts per billion). In fact, anything higher content than that can harm pollinator hives. If the seed of a plant was pre-treated with the neonicotinoid, then sprayed with it as a plant, surely the level is far higher than the measly 25 ppb ceiling the EPA is calling safe. This enables corporate chemical agriculture industries to push the seeds and the spray at alarming amounts, all for profit, while the world’s most vital “food makers” are being killed off by the swarms, including the queen bee mortality during “spring planting” time, when all the chemicals are “doubled up.” (23)

EPA porn and theft issues – employees caught repeating offenses over years
For two years, the people of Flint, Michigan have been consuming brain-damaging lead in their drinking water while the EPA secretly gave state employees clean water, being well aware of the problem for everyone else, and where that problem began–when the water source was shifted over to lead pipes, knowingly. Leaked e-mails reveal there was no budgeting issue for the EPA either.
The EPA while completely ignoring a massive health issue they knew about continued on with business as usual, where employees have been caught watching porn, getting drunk and stealing electronics–AT WORK–and still are not fired or held liable for any damages to the population of Flint, Michigan, all while they drink bottled water by recommendation of the EPA. This all according to the EPA’s Office of Inspector General, summarized in three reports as supervised between April of 2014 and September of 2015 (that’s a year and a half) that took place while the people of Flint were being poisoned with lead-loaded water.
Why weren’t the employees investigating claims FILED by the residents of Flint, complaining about the quality of the tap water? Were they told not to respond? Were these employees fired or suspended? Actually, a senior executive service official (SES) illegally took vacation while being paid for working. He resigned. No penalties. One EPA manager stole thousands of dollars in grant funds and got a “slap on the wrist” demotion for it.

Monsanto’s partnership with the EPA:
2007: Glyphosate becomes the most widely used herbicide in US agriculture, and the second most widely used herbicide in the home and garden sector.
US agriculture sector applies 185 million pounds of glyphosate on the continent.
US home and garden sector applies 7 million more pounds of glyphosate to the earth and plants.
US industry, commerce and government apply nearly 15 million more pounds of glyphosate to the earth, plants, and indirectly, the groundwater.

Former Monsanto VPs and lobbyists and representatives hold positions of power inside the US government, Supreme Court, legislative, executive, judicial, and regulatory bodies. The US needs to enact the wholesale reform of several regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, CDC, USDA, AMA and of course, the EPA. The EPA needs to live up to its name and actually start protecting the environment instead of corporate interests.
Sources:
(1) http://www.naturalnews.com/051015_EPA_pollution_Animas_River_chemical_spill.html#ixzz41UDYVO8J
(2) http://epawatch.org/2016-02-16-outraged-citizen-scientists-launch-non-profit-water-testing-initiative-to-check-every-u-s-city-for-lead-epawatch-org.html
(3) http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/pdf/MonographVolume112.pdf
(4) http://www.naturalnews.com/050658_glyphosate_testing_Roundup_contamination_carcinogen.html
(5) http://www.naturalnews.com/052179_global_warming_science_fraud_globalist_control_agenda.html#ixzz41UHDEKAc
(6) http://www.naturalnews.com/001807_fluoride_fluoridation.html#ixzz41UKzyqh0
(7) http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=42652E035A1B1BAAAE1F340B54694975
(8) http://healthranger.com/
(9) http://www.naturalnews.com/053126_EPA_employees_government_corruption_lead_contaminated_water.html#ixzz41Uyojwky
(10) http://www.naturalnews.com/048318_EPA_Gulf_of_Mexico_dead_zone.html
(11) http://www.naturalnews.com/053137_EPA_Monsanto_glyphosate_contamination.html#ixzz41YdlT3iw
(12) http://consumerwellness.org/
(13) http://epawatch.org/2016-01-15-epa-fda-raising-their-own-private-armies-with-body-armor-and-military-weapons.html
(14) http://www.gmoseralini.org/en/
(15) http://www.naturalnews.com/031871_radiation_rainwater.html#ixzz41aR5x2CT
(16) http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_influenza_vaccines_mercury.html#ixzz41UKPc0e3
(17) http://www.naturalnews.com/046630_cdc_whistleblower_public_confession_dr_william_thompson.html
(18) http://www.truthwiki.org/dr-william-thompson/
(19) http://labs.naturalnews.com/
(20) http://fluoridealert.org/issues/health/cancer/
(21) http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/02/fukushima-fuel-rods-completely-melted
(22) http://www.naturalnews.com/053166_honeybees_neonicotinoids_EPA_lawsuit.html#ixzz41kSvHhJx
(23) http://civileats.com/2016/01/20/as-bees-die-off-the-epa-shuffles-its-feet/
(24) http://fluoridealert.org/issues/health/cancer/
(25) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23756170
(26) http://blogs.naturalnews.com/america-running-time-dr-oz-says-asking-urgent-help-stopping-new-gmos-see-httpalthealthworks-com3896america-running-time-dr/
(27) http://www.naturalnews.com/040842_glyphosate_EPA_regulations_contamination_levels.html#ixzz41VR54EDS

Monday, May 30, 2016

Yellow Journalism means printing opinions instead of facts - so then, what do we call the New York Times?


The Pulitzer prize-grabbing New York Times or “NYT” began as the New-York Daily Times in 1851. A Whig Party member by the name of Henry Jarvis Raymond, politician and journalist, founded the paper, which at the time sold for one penny. Six years later, the word “Daily” was dropped from the name, but they didn’t drop the hyphen in New-York until the 1890s.

Ironically, the newspaper first ran a series of exposés ending a Democratic New York city hall reign by William Magear “Boss” Tweed, but in the 1880s, their Republican Party favorable editorials that were helping candidates essentially faded and the newspaper turned more analytical and less politically “dependent.” Then, in 1894, the NYT supported Democrat Grover Cleveland’s run for the White House, a move that ended up costing them readership. The newspaper that was LOSING MONEY at the time was bought in the late 1890s by Adolph Ochs, publisher of the Chattanooga Times, whose motto was to publish “All the news that’s fit to print,” – the signature coined phrase is printed at the top left corner of the front page still today. This slogan was actually a jab at the competing papers like the New York Journal and New York World, at the time, which had reputations for being sensationalist papers chock full of “yellow journalism.”

By the turn of the 20th century, NYT achieved international circulation
The newspaper received their first wireless telegraph transmission from a naval battle engaging the Imperial Russian Navy at the Battle of Port Arthur, near Korea in 1904. The paper delivered their first papers by air to Philadelphia by 1910.

In the 1940s, at the end of World War II, the NYT added crossword puzzles, a fashion section, and an international edition, in addition to purchasing an AM radio station. Fifty years later The New York Times was leasing their radio station to ABC Radio to sport its “Radio Disney,” which Disney ended up purchasing in 2007. That was then sold to a religious radio network just last year, 2014.

Today, owners of the New York Times Company and decendents of Adolph Ochs (the Sulzberger family) still maintain a dominant role in The New York Times. The Ochs-Sulzberger family trust controls most of the New York Times (stock) structure with six of the eight directors sitting on the board of their family trust. With the advent and mass popularity of the internet and alternative media news and truthmedia, NYT’s readership and circulation dropped significantly, to under a million, for the first time since the 1980s. As of recent, the paper costs around $2.50 on weekdays and about $5.00 for the Sunday addition, which sells about 1.7 million copies. Still, the New York Times, like so many other “soothsayers,” is losing readership day by day, thanks to alternative media and social media. Many truthmedia fanatics are exposing the shill-like tactics of major newspapers like the Washington Post, (1)with its paid biotech shills (like Tamar Haspel) (2) and political right-hands that publish whatever the script that’s handed down from the oval office, biotech or big pharma. (3) Rogue journalists, public scientists, academics, and GMO “insiders” are being probed by GM Watch and the US Right-to-Know group using the FOIA–Freedom of Information Act to reveal dozens of propagandists (in a document cloud provided HERE) who collude behind closed doors to spread propaganda for illegal payoffs, “spiffs” and luxurious vacations as gifts to use any way they like, per the FOIA publishings of their insider emails. (4) (6) This was all published by the New York Times, almost unbelievably.

June of 1971, NYT starts publishing leaked “Pentagon Papers”
The publishing of the Pentagon Papers showed the world that the US government was deliberately EXPANDING its role in Vietnam, conducting air strikes over Laos and raids along the North Vietnam coastline, all while President Lyndon B. Johnson PROMISED not to expand the war. Sound familiar? This is similar to Obama and the New York Times working hard to confiscate US citizens’ weapons while expanding the war on terror in the Middle East, Europe and now on US soil, and perpetuating (enabling) mass border security failures and illegal immigration. Even more importantly, the publishing of the Pentagon Papers set the precedent that the US government had a major credibility gap, and wasn’t to be trusted about quelling any future wars, including the recent invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and possibly Syria next.

Next, President Nixon threatened to burn at the stake (“torch”) whomever was responsible for the great information “leak,” saying,
“People have gotta be put to the torch for this sort of thing…” and “Let’s get the son-of-a-bitch in jail.”

Again, parallels can be drawn to today and the so-called “War on Terror” where George W. Bush swore to catch’em “Dead or Alive” and called them “Evil Do’ers” and now Obama swears to catch the ISIS and ISIL “terrorists” that the US government funds and provides weapons to, again perpetuating propaganda and a behind-the-scenes government insidious agenda. (10) By 1971, The Washington Post began publishing their own series – as they obtained certain parts of the Pentagon Papers. The US Justice Department sought injuction. It all ended up in the Supreme Court after appeals, but the Court decided 6–3 that the injuctions were UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR RESTRAINTS and the US government had not met the burden of proof. Free speech won that day.
Here are the “Declassified Documents” as released by National Archives and Records Administration:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specialreports/pentagon-papers/
 
First woman reporter at NY Times was not allowed to tell anyone she was hired
Jane Grant was nicknamed “Fluff” by the other reporters and was subject to gender descrimination, hazing, with no hope for promotion, and this according to the Editor. Jane worked at the NYT for 15 years, until WWI began.
 
January, 2009: NYT in Financial Trouble: Carlos Slim, 2nd richest person in the world, lends NYT $250 million
The Mexican telecomm magnate helped the NYT by making additional investments in the TIMES stock purchasing nearly 16 million shares (about 17% of total) during the financial crisis of 2009. Along with several other “heavy hitter” newspapers, such as the Wall Street Journal and USA Today, the NYT narrowed its paper by half a foot to save costs (about $12 million a year) while circulation further dwindles down. Massive advertising revenues have also been lost as most people just don’t look for ads in the newspapers anymore–they would rather use the internet for shopping for deals. Plus, the NYT reputation for “groundbreaking journalism” had gone down the tubes with the advertising revenue and readership in general. NYT began resorting to sensationalism and daring diction to try to keep people’s interests, such as substituting the word “torture” for harsh interrogations or brutal questioning. Still, today, the NYT is seen as having a far-right slant on financial issues, yet also featuring a liberal slant and a political slant, with liberal biases on abortion and gay marriage. NYT has “endorsed” every Democratic nominee for president, after it last endorsed a Republican, that being Eisenhower, back in the mid-1950s. However, NYT endorsed incumbent Republican Mayors of NY City Giuliani in ’97 and Bloomberg in ’05 and ’09.

Iraq, Iran and Israel controversies
Some reporting leading up to and during the Iraq War was inaccurate and favored the Bush administration’s agenda, and the NYT ended up admitting and apologizing for it. A 2015 study revealed NYT was as biased as Iranian media regarding the Iranian nuclear crisis. In 2014 the NYT admitted to factual errors in an Op-Ed criticizing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The NYT criticized in 2001 for minimizing reports during Holocaust:

An associate professor of journalism at Northeastern University said the Old Gray Lady (NYT) downplayed the Third Reich’s targeting of Jewish people for genocide in her 2005 book “Buried by the Times.” How did the newspaper do that? They buried the news stories deep in the pages knowing the persecution and EXECUTION of Jews was going on. This included perverted Nazi crimes, mass medical experimentation on Jews, raping, and forced pharmaceuticals, fluoridated water and more. NYT was not exactly functioning as the old “Newspaper of Record.”

NYT claims spam attack, then apologizes for spamming its entire email list

A staffer at the NYT sent over 8 million people (NYT subscribers over the years) a list of 300 emails of the people who had canceled home delivery of the newspaper. Ever heard of the whipping post? It was a slap in the face, of course, and the newspaper would not “fess up.” They denied responsibility. It was obvious from their reaction that “All the news that’s fit to printwasn’t fit to print at all at that moment in time. They denied and denied:
“The e-mail is SPAM and was not sent from The New York Times. We are alerting subscribers immediately.”
And here’s their Twitter Tweet: “If you received an e-mail today about canceling your NYT subscription, ignore it. It’s not from us.”

NY Times blasts vaccine propagandist #1 – Mr. Paul Offit – the pro-vaccine puppet
NYT blasted the new Offit book as vaccine quackery and a “fervent attack job” that’s thinly sourced and poorly researched, even though Offit is mainstream media’s lead puppet promoting vaccines, calling anyone who asks questions or has doubts about the validity and safety of vaccines “anti-vaxxers.” Most health enthusiasts simply want clean vaccines or no vaccines at all, knowing that many of the neurotoxins in vaccines and flu shots, like mercury, formaldehyde and aluminum lead to chronic sick care problems and cancer, autism, and Alzheimer’s–to name a few preventable diseases and disorders caused directly by vaccine toxins, not to mention antibiotic overuse and pharmaceutical use and abuse. It seems as though the now infamous Dr. Offit made all his own opinionated, broad and imprecise conclusions and went in search of answers he never found.

New York Times exposes GMO and Biotech propagandists!
Outrageous academic and science fraud took the main stage of alternative news and truth media when the New York Times publishes a piece exposing America’s university “public scientists” whoring themselves out for spiffs (bonus checks you could do “anything you want to” with, to the tune of $25,000). Charlatans for horticulturalists, hacks for journalists and hucksters for reporters all colluded through a string of thousands of emails to push GMO propaganda and say that everything genetically modified is absolutely wonderful, health, sustainable, and any other buzz words they all agreed would coerce and win over Americans riding the fence (skeptics) about “Frankenfoods” – produce that contains synthetic chemical pesticides and is often sprayed with cancer-causing herbicides, namely Roundup and Glyphosate.

New Media News Movement stronger than New York Times
Most mainstream media is terrified to criticize or attack GMO, pharmaceuticals as dangerous medicine, vaccinations, flu shots, or anything status quo, for fear of losing sponsors and massive advertising revenue. When NYT published the whistle-blowing proof that Monsanto was hiring shills to regurgitate their PR lies as facts, the alternative media world went wild, saying to all the naysayer, “Told you so!” Conspiracy theories all snapped into reality in one instant. This you would never find in the Monsanto-run Washington Post. The laundry list of sold-out shills is published and there’s no taking it back. Their emails all exposed, talking the talk and laughing while naming themselves shills. It’s all in black and white, with their signature lines and personal contact information all over it, page after page, after page. Kevin Folta and Jon Entine are shaking in their boots each day when they go to the shill factory and publish more pro-GMO lies–they’re reputations blown out of the water by The New York Times themselves.

Biotech Mercenaries Exposed and Destroyed via FOIA Requests
Gary Ruskin of the U.S. Right To Know organization, which supports GMO labeling and full transparency of “scientists” who claim to be “independent” voices on GMOs, revealed dozens of biotech mercenaries who claim their published opinions are their own, all in a grand attempt to brainwash hundreds of millions of Americans, not to mention city councils, judges, federal regulators, the Supreme Court and even the President. To date, there is no such thing as a pro-GMO scientist, according to J.D. Heyes, investigative reporter and journalist for NaturalNews.com, the largest health news website in the world, with over 7 million visitors monthly sharing the truth about the propaganda and disinformation being spread regularly by the biotech Big 6 – Monsanto, Bayer, BASF, Dow, Dupont and Syngenta. (12) Don’t forget about Cargill, either. Paid shills revealed in their emails their connections run deep in the biotech industry and they are paid to say what the industry reps write, even when they claim to be functioning in science’s best interest and “in the public’s best interest” and for the “betterment of mankind” and “for sustainability” and any other slogans they can steal and morph from organic agriculture.

Dr. Kevin Folta, biotech shill and epitome of fraud committed by Monsanto
Dr. Folta is among the most aggressive and prolific biotech proponents, although until his emails were released last month, he had not publicly acknowledged the extent of his ties to Monsanto.”
Shortly after the NYT exposed the Monsanto huckster team that was under advisement from the infamous Ketchum PR firm, another charlatan-style biotech huckster team called the “Council for Biotechnology Information” (controlled by the Big 6 working in tandem), asked Dr. Folta to write fake questions and propaganda answers for GMOAnswers.com, a prop website staged to trick consumers into a Q&A that leads them right back to eating cancer-causing food that’s processed and/or genetically modified. (11)

Revelation: Monsanto, the world’s largest seed company, plans propaganda spread via college professors, researchers and scientists
No longer is Monsanto scrambling to put out their own “brush fires,” but now they are consumed by their own scorched earth policies and their stock is dropping rapidly. Countries are banning GMO altogether across the world, while the USA sits in darkness, without even a GMO label, not understanding the true decimation of food, soil, water, environment and human and animal life that’s going on, all while big pharma rakes in billions of dollars on the other end, at the hospitals that use more chemicals, namely chemotherapy and prescription medications, to quell the symptoms of pesticide-food-disease (cancer), and the whole ponzi-sick-care-scheme is called Obamacare! The New York Times did a major favor for health enthusiasts across the world and set a precedent for recognizing biotech lies from here on out. The weight of their “authority” is crumbling by the day. It was too obvious as they implicated themselves. Charla Lord, a Monsanto spokeswoman, had said:
“It is in the public interest for academics to weigh in credibly, not only to consumers but to stakeholders like lawmakers and regulators as well.”
Bottom line: The biotech industry has basically published dozens of articles, under the names of prominent academics, that were drafted by industry consultants, and thankfully the US Right to Know group and the New York Times exposed it all. The biggest deceit going on is in the premise that everything these biotech shills say and write they claim is based on scientific evidence and safety research, when it’s clearly not. These are just dirty lobbying tactics in action and it should all be illegal. At least now SOME of the public has been made aware.

December 4, 2015: New York Times runs front page editorial saying the time has come to ban and confiscate assault weapons from all US citizens
Proving they are STILL just a mouthpiece for the White House, the NYT sprung off the emotional news of terrorists shooting up an American facility and called for Americans to make themselves MORE vulnerable to ISIS (4) and the rogue US government run by a Muslim who has opened all the borders to terrorists, granting them money for food, visa, jobs, healthcare, immunity from the law, drivers licenses, and the right to vote Democratic (hint, hint) in the next election. As the Obama administration seeks to control all Americans and take away their second amendment rights, the police-state of America gains favor with “patriots” who think the government is going to save them when the economy implodes and the financial tsunami covers the continent.
As the NYT tells Americans to voluntarily disarm themselves and congratulates the tyrannical Democrats running the show, anyone succumbing to this atrocity will be quickly reminded how the Jews felt during the Holocaust, after he had them all register their guns, then confiscated them door to door, and then led them all to the gas chambers or to the end of a pistol that shot a bullet in their head. On the one hand the NYT exposes the lies of biotech, and shortly after tells Americans it is wise to put down their weapons in the face of domestic terror because their corrupt government and hapless (SS-style militia) police forces like DHS and FEMA will protect them under the new martial law of the New World Order and that the “Demoncrats” will save them from terror, starvation, and so on. The official story is that the San Bernardino mass shooting is a federal terrorism investigation, so why call for mass gun confiscation of LEGAL, LAW-ABIDING US CITIZENS WHO HAVE GUN PERMITS AND 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS?

According to the NYT,
“Motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut, and far too many other places.”

In other words, it wouldn’t matter if the so-called terrorists came into the country from Mexico talking a few words of Spanish and bought guns at a gun store illegally, and prayed to ISIS or ISIL on Facebook before the crazed shooting spree, ALL AMERICANS must now forfeit their inherent right to defend themselves with guns, and all of this while the Department of Homeland Security buys BILLIONS OF ROUNDS of hollow point bullets, thousands of heavy-armored bomb-proofed metro “tanks” to storm suburbia America, enough automatic weapons (yes they ones the NY Times wants to ban) to fight a domestic war with US citizens, and all this while FEMA buys mass graves for the upcoming apocalyptic economic and financial collapse of America. Let it be very clear that the New York Times is not just calling for a ban on assault weapons, but they want the government to go door to door across the continent and confiscate all of them.

Yellow Journalism means printing opinions instead of facts, as the New York Times just published their positive opinion of Obama’s MASS GUN CONFISCATION agenda
Just as Hitler said the “Master Race” was for the good of everyone on Planet Earth, so does the New York Times tell us that owners of guns need to understand that outlawing and confiscating such (automatic) weapons from law-abiding citizens is part of pursuing “the good” of everyone:

“Certain types of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in [the San Bernardino attack], and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership. It is possible to define those guns in a clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own these kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens.”

Sources:
(1) http://www.truthwiki.org/washington-post/
(2) http://www.truthwiki.org/tamar-haspel-washington-post-columnist/
(3) http://www.naturalnews.com/051098_Monsanto_influence_academic_prostitutes_New_York_Times.html#ixzz3tdG7n17b
(4) http://gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/16438-new-report-probes-pro-gmo-journalists
(5) http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/12/05/nyt-san-bernardino-attack-motives-not-matter-ban-confiscate-weapons-war/
(6) http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/06/us/food-industry-enlisted-academics-in-gmo-lobbying-war-emails-show.html?_r=2
(7) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2303691-kevin-folta-uoffloridadocs.html#document/p10/a237532
(8) http://www.naturalnews.com/034521_New_York_Times_email_spam.html#ixzz3tdFrIAQj
(9) http://www.naturalnews.com/050850_Paul_Offit_New_York_Times_book_review.html#ixzz3tdHh67JU
(10) http://www.naturalnews.com/052221_Obama_sleeper_cell_radical_Islam.htmlhttp://www.naturalnews.com/052221_Obama_sleeper_cell_radical_Islam.html
(11) http://www.truthwiki.org/gmo-answers-biotechnology-website-gmoanswers-com/
(12) http://www.truthwiki.org/ig-farben-pharmaceutical-conglomerate-1916-to-2015/

What is Dirty Electricity?

What is Dirty Electricity? Dirty electricity is a term coined by the electrical utility industry to describe electromagnetic interfer...